Recent Episodes
-
May 6, 2025: Trump and Carney face off
May 6, 2025 – 11:14 -
May 5, 2025: The dolls and pencils economy
May 5, 2025 – 11:23 -
May 2, 2025: Take this Waltz
May 2, 2025 – 09:57 -
May 1, 2025: How do you sell Trumponomics?
May 1, 2025 – 11:33 -
April 30, 2025: Trump returns to the trail
Apr 30, 2025 – 12:40 -
April 29, 2025: Day 100
Apr 29, 2025 – 13:50 -
April 28, 2025: Trump nears a historic benchmark
Apr 28, 2025 – 12:25 -
April 25, 2025: The Karoline Leavitt effect
Apr 25, 2025 – 10:18 -
April 24, 2025: Trump ratchets up pressure on Zelenskyy
Apr 24, 2025 – 10:12 -
April 23, 2025: The White House tries to calm the markets
Apr 23, 2025 – 11:14 -
April 22, 2025: Trump’s ‘chaos’ strategy vs. the global economy
Apr 22, 2025 – 11:38 -
April 21, 2025: New Hegseth controversy roils Washington
Apr 21, 2025 – 09:56 -
April 18, 2024: Trump's messy breakup with mainstream media
Apr 18, 2025 – 09:25 -
April 17, 2025: Inside the Lutnick-Trump alliance
Apr 17, 2025 – 11:09 -
April 16, 2025: The making of the next big SCOTUS showdown
Apr 16, 2025 – 11:47 -
April 15, 2025: Where is Kilmar Abrego Garcia?
Apr 15, 2025 – 11:01 -
April 14, 2025: Inside the chaos at HHS
Apr 14, 2025 – 10:31 -
April 11, 2025: It’s still the economy, stupid
Apr 11, 2025 – 10:45 -
April 10, 2025: Trump’s tariff two-step
Apr 10, 2025 – 09:57 -
April 9, 2025: 'This is not Trump 45'
Apr 9, 2025 – 11:50 -
April 8, 2025: Trump's trade chief heads to Capitol Hill
Apr 8, 2025 – 11:30 -
April 7, 2025: Trump world’s mixed messages on tariffs
Apr 7, 2025 – 11:48 -
April 4, 2025: Tariffs tumble markets
Apr 4, 2025 – 10:51 -
April 3, 2025: Trump sets off a global trade war
Apr 3, 2025 – 12:11 -
April 2, 2025: Voters send a message to Elon Musk
Apr 2, 2025 – 11:20 -
April 1, 2025: One seat, two seat; red seat … blue seat?
Apr 1, 2025 – 10:39 -
March 31, 2025: The first electoral test of Trump 2.0
Mar 31, 2025 – 10:39 -
March 28, 2025: The Stefanik shuffle
Mar 28, 2025 – 09:55 -
March 27, 2025: Why Signalgate has staying power
Mar 27, 2025 – 09:31 -
March 26, 2025: 'Signalgate' fallout ripples through the White House
Mar 26, 2025 – 10:08 -
March 25, 2025: ‘Signalgate’ rocks the Trump administration
Mar 25, 2025 – 10:40 -
March 24, 2025: The budget countdown begins
Mar 24, 2025 – 09:12 -
March 21, 2025: The Musk Factor
Mar 21, 2025 – 08:06 -
March 20, 2025: Ivory towers vs. Trump’s wrecking ball
Mar 20, 2025 – 07:06 -
March 19, 2025: The courtroom presidency
Mar 19, 2025 – 10:07 -
March 18, 2025: Inching closer to a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire
Mar 18, 2025 – 10:31 -
March 17, 2025: Democrats’ identity crisis intensifies
Mar 17, 2025 – 09:12 -
March 14, 2025: Schumer giveth and Schumer taketh away
Mar 14, 2025 – 09:30 -
March 13, 2025: A (way too early) look at 2028
Mar 13, 2025 – 09:03 -
March 12, 2025: Johnson gets a win and market losses mount
Mar 12, 2025 – 09:26 -
March 11, 2025: What counts as free speech in Trump’s America?
Mar 11, 2025 – 10:19 -
March 10, 2025: House GOP scrambles to avoid a shutdown
Mar 10, 2025 – 09:35 -
March 7, 2025: Capitol Hill confidential
Mar 7, 2025 – 09:49 -
March 6, 2025: Is Trump’s trade war an own goal?
Mar 6, 2025 – 10:16 -
March 5, 2025: Trump doubles down
Mar 5, 2025 – 12:46 -
March 4, 2025: What to expect from Trump’s joint address
Mar 4, 2025 – 08:52 -
March 3, 2025: Is DOGE overshadowing Trump?
Mar 3, 2025 – 09:58 -
February 28, 2025: Zelenskyy tries to make a deal
Feb 28, 2025 – 09:14 -
February 27, 2025: The British Invasion, 2025 edition
Feb 27, 2025 – 07:50 -
February 26, 2025: House passes the ‘big, beautiful bill’
Feb 26, 2025 – 05:20
Recent Reviews
-
Roxstar1999😍Love new longer format with jack and dasha 🤩
-
bovice127Going downhillOn the whole, Politico remains one of the better and more in-depth news outlets out there. This podcast does still contain flashes of that serious and informative reporting, but has been declining in quality over the past year or so. This podcast, along with much of the media, is still clearly floundering with how to report on the Trump administration. For all the recent negative reviews complaining of left-wing bias, you won’t find much here. Instead you will find palace intrigue and little else of substance. Perhaps leaning into the gossip is how this podcast plans to handle the next four (or more) years, but it is unsatisfactory. When put into context palace intrigue and gossip do have their place and can be crucial in understanding the inner workings of a political regime but this podcast has leaned too heavily into these for their own sake. The reporting now feels like socialites recounting the most recent faux pas at a cocktail party and not professional journalists. It is becoming increasingly divorced from the consequences of political action outside of the few square miles of the Mall. I do not lay blame for this solely on the hosts, it is an editorial decision that starts from the top. As an aside (or maybe a symptomatic consequence of the journalistic direction of the podcast), we all know you are Washington insiders and it’s clear this podcast is designed specifically for that audience in mind. But for someone on the periphery of that world it reminds me of what is insufferable about it. It is exhausting to hear the near daily humble bragging about the exclusive parties you were invited to or how tired you always are because it appears that being a Washington reporter requires the stamina of an ultra marathoner. I’m all for the hosts having fun and showing personality, they do not need to be aloof, but the personality on display is tedious for the listener.
-
MissionManSFSo much betterSo much better now without Daniels’ odd tone-deaf and unprofessional constant joviality.
-
jayefromjerseyEarly birdJohn is doing a great job. Fantastic that his podcast is early
-
tiena9Love!I love this podcast to start my day and find out what I need to know in this crazy political climate. Best of luck, Eugene! I truly will miss your voice in the mornings as I get ready for my day. 💙
-
Greg PotterGovernment biased newsFunded by USAID. Can I give less than zero stars as a rating?
-
Great unmasks geishapainfully liberal and just keeps going downhillI have listened to the playbook daily briefing for almost 10 years. It was amazing during the original hosts. Ever since they left it’s just gotten more liberal and annoying. I voted for Clinton/Biden/Harris but I don’t tune into this podcast for media slant. Just report the news.
-
JT's Golden NannoWayyy too One-sided-liberal only!Sad that your hosts cannot be objective overall.
-
jenny emily thompsonIncorrect informationThe host said, “You don't see that with other presidents, where they're willing to do something that they know is going to go to court, and as a matter of fact, may know is going to be struck down by one court or another, right?” (Jan 21 2025) — That’s patently false. It’s exactly what Biden did with student loan forgiveness multiple times. He even admitted it may not be legal or be struck down.
-
ihatenicknames99JuvenileEugene Daniels is not a serious man. This is beneath Politico. News is serious business, especially these days. Let’s get professionals, not silly juveniles.
-
Casual LissenerStart your podcast day with this podcast.I love this podcast. It’s quick and to the point. This is usually the first podcast I listen in the morning. It gets me ready to hear all the others that really pale in comparison. Eugene Daniels is my favorite host. He’s funny and really smart. Keep up the good work
-
tsi123Mediocre.Uneven Washington insight. Eugene Daniels is the worst. Adds absolutely nothing to the conversation about Wepublicans, Democwats, and Pwesident Bi-Din.
-
Jay in MDUnplug Eugene for a great podcastExcellent content of what’s going on in DC, but trashed by all the snarky comments and useless cursing by Eugene Daniels. Finally had to turn to another option when the noise got to be too much.
-
heididat504No longer a politics podcastUnfortunately Politico’s rightward turn had led to this podcast no longer being about what’s driving the day in Washington, but all about what’s happening in Trumpworld.
-
Happy commuter123So disappointed in Oct 7 Israel-Gaza coverageDo not rely on the Hamas Health Ministry regarding how many people have been killed or gone hungry. Do better, Politico.
-
DCtlbUseful and DelightfulI’m a daily listener. Great content, great concision. And great hosts, but particularly Eugene Daniels, who is so smart and such a pleasure to listen to.
-
Che BlockDo you all rememberThe immigration bill that trump quashed? That’s an important detail and would be helpful to you in your evaluations and podcast
-
DataprophetsApp does not workWhen I follow this show, all the episodes disappear from its feed. When I unfollow they come back. This only happens on the apple podcast app.
-
midwestBluewrong againyou said hope hicks helped trump defense saying trump was worried about melania rather than winning the presidency but you are wrong. you should go back and read the transcripts because that was minor. the major testimony of hicks was that trump was worried about winning the pres race and wanted stories killed for that reason. get it right politico hacks.
-
misty3303Generally a good morning recapBut what’s up with having Ankush Khardori on to give the commentary on the Trump trials? He couldn’t have been any more biased and his ignorance about the subject given his single focus showed. Definitely impacted my opinion of this show as I looked for balanced reporting. Thank goodness Ryan Lizza and Rachel Bade offset segments like this one!
-
second class citizen voicesM.Biased coverage of student protests. Clear pro Israel influence.
-
matt2377reviewamazing resourceThis is the place the pros go to get their quick informative coverage. Solid work to the whole team; your efforts are obvious and appreciated.
-
bGuilesWhat took me so long to listen?!Wow. Thank you SO MUCH for minimizing ads and placing them at end of episodes! And for delivering such excellent coverage in this and your Deep Dive podcast, also new to me. Both so smart and helpful. Thank you!
-
CRJ84531OkaySome interesting tidbits but super low production value and the host can’t seem to stop giggling and injecting partisan bias. Very unprofessional.
-
MndbalowurbbOct 19I find the jaunty tone offensive when reporting on grave matters of state like the potential far right take over of the speakership. You have allowed your delight as a jaded reporter watching political maneuvering to overshadow the gravity of the moment . Grow up .
-
akspignerAPIIt’s impossible to get past the American Petroleum Institute ad at the top of the show when we are in the throes of the climate crisis. Begging journalists and publications to draw a line in the sand.
-
AS7580Stopped listeningAs soon as I heard the podcast was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute. Do better politico.
-
ggosyHappy Birthday Rachael Bade!I enjoy your rundown on my morning walks. Good concise and informative. Thank you! And it’s my birthday today too! Happy happy!
-
virutalreggieneeds old host backnew show isn’t as good. anyway to get rahgu back?
-
Annabelle81206No good anymoreNot sure what happened but this used to be a quick great way to get headline news for me in the mornings. Now it’s bad jokes and bad interviews with reporters that goes to in depth. Just tell me the news quickly please. I also miss the old reporter from last summer he was great
-
Luki4Production value gone downhillThis used to be a slick little 5 minute podcast each day, simple, but well produced. Recently they dropped all of the polish.
-
LoganfoolI do not understand this narratorI could not understand a word the male host was saying today. Something about Biden disobeying Covid and Idaho people. Did they tie together?
-
jwoooooooooMajor downgradeProduction value seems like it’s recorded on a phone. The new guy can’t help himself form adding in a partisan spin.
-
SfcascaderGood basic info but bring back Raghu!!!The show used to have some level of production value now it’s just feels like they’re reading. Even some. Basic production like Politico’s energy podcast snippets would be better.
-
KenBnNYCWhat happened to playback? 👎🏾The content and usefulness of this “playbook” has suffered a precipitous decline. No objective coverage , no breakdown of Washington power players - it feels like the Washington version of a supermarket gossip rag.
-
Cocain HorseGone downhillThe first two minutes of April 27ths podcast was so laughably partisan I think I’ve officially given up on playbook. Y’all used to at least pretend to be bipartisan. On to Punchbowl.
-
Razadaz1Todays podcastI looked to this in the am for a quick truthful update on what’s happening. Looking for gossip? Keep it anonymous? What? Might be time to look elsewhere.
-
Rip RynessYour betters listen to this showTodays episode on the “ethics” issue of Justice Thomas was so dishonest. No mention of Thomas’ responses and they insinuated he is stonewalling. Also the show has really gone down hill since the last host left.
-
Mike DreydenTERRIBLE!!!!OMG! Where’s the production?! No music?! No character! #BringBackRaghu!!!!
-
C0urtSupremeNeed new reader.Annoying reader. Can’t listen.
-
mj87OzIs Raghu okay?My man needs a breathing treatment, once you hear the wheezy inhale at the start of every sentences… it’s hard to hear anything else.
-
Booka BookaSuper excitedI’ve always liked this show very much but I’m VERY excited to learn that the great Alex Keeney a/k/a Keendawg is joining the team. Fantastic decision, Political Playbookers.
-
Pat D MilneWhy horoscopes on a daily political news podcast?Basically the title, no need for idiotic horoscopes on a daily news podcast. Also the cadence of the presenter’s voice is awful.
-
CSfromCOGood content- difficult voiceThe content is usually great, but this host is difficult to listen to. His voice fluctuates and I find him hard to understand. Also speaks too fast. PS: why horoscopes?
-
fhwifbtoNew Changes = No goodDislike the new long form interviews tacked on at the end of playbook. It’s unnecessary in my option, playbook is a quick dive into what’s happen in the beltway. The addition is giving knock off “Daily” podcast. Please go back to the old format.
-
Matt TiskLeave the Horoscopes to the NewspaperCan you just report the news and leave the horoscope chat out? It’s a waste of time!
-
DokterbanWhy horoscopes?Please stop with the horoscopes, it’s nonsense that doesn’t belong in a show where people seek news. Might as well go full Pop-Start and give a daily Kardashian update. Do better, assume the audience aren’t all idiots that believe in astrology.
-
DingarethUseful morning brief ruinedThis used to be a great daily rundown of what’s happening in DC, now it’s a gossipy show that has somehow spent more time on horoscopes and birthdays than on Congress the past couple of weeks.
-
DkejjebeebedjsnsneneWhy are there horoscopes on a political news podcastNext time I hear a horoscope I’m unsubscribing.
-
Sunnyside45Hard to listen toI just started this podcast and the narrator’s speaking cadence is so slow, it’s hard to listen to. I listen at 1 1/4 speed which helps a little, but please speak faster. No one naturally speaks that way! Especially when reading.
Similar Podcasts
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.